Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Aging Cell ; 21(11): e13727, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2063328

ABSTRACT

There is still a significant lack of knowledge regarding many aspects of the etiopathology and consequences of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in humans. For example, the variety of molecular mechanisms mediating this infection, and the long-term consequences of the disease remain poorly understood. It first seemed like the SARS-CoV-2 infection primarily caused a serious respiratory syndrome. However, over the last years, an increasing number of studies also pointed towards the damaging effects of this infection has on the central nervous system (CNS). In fact, evidence suggests a possible disruption of the blood-brain barrier and deleterious effects on the CNS, especially in patients who already suffer from other pathologies, such as neurodegenerative disorders. The molecular mechanisms behind these effects on the CNS could involve the dysregulation of mitochondrial physiology, a well-known early marker of neurodegeneration and a hallmark of aging. Moreover, mitochondria are involved in the activation of the inflammatory response, which has also been broadly described in the CNS in COVID-19. Here, we critically review the current bibliography regarding the presence of neurodegenerative symptoms in COVID-19 patients, with a special emphasis on the mitochondrial mechanisms of these disorders.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Blood-Brain Barrier , Central Nervous System , Mitochondria
3.
Canadian liver journal ; 4(2):79-81, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1998997
4.
Women Birth ; 35(5): 484-492, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1483011

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM & BACKGROUND: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, policies have been implemented to limit interpersonal contact in clinical and community settings. The impacts of pandemic-related policies on experiences of pregnancy and birth are crucial to investigate and learn from. AIM: To examine the impact of pandemic policy changes on experiences of pregnancy and birth, thereby identifying barriers to good care; to inform understandings of medicalization, care, pregnancy, and subjectivity during times of crisis; and to critically examine the assumptions about pregnancy and birth that are sustained and produced through policy. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study drawing on 67 in-depth interviews with people who were pregnant and/or gave birth in Canada during the pandemic. The study took a social constructionist standpoint and employed thematic analysis to derive meaning from study data. FINDINGS: The pandemic has resulted in an overall scaling back of perinatal care alongside the heavy use of interventions (e.g., induction of labour, cesarian section) in response to pandemic stresses and uncertainties. Intervention use here is an outcome of negotiation and collaboration between pregnant people and their care providers as they navigate pregnancy and birth in stressful, uncertain conditions. DISCUSSION: Continuity of care throughout pregnancy and postpartum, labour support persons, and non-clinical services and interventions for pain management are all essential components of safe maternal healthcare. However, pandemic perinatal care demonstrates that they are not viewed as such. CONCLUSION: The pandemic has provided an opportunity to restructure Canadian reproductive health care to better support and encourage out-of-hospital births - including midwife-assisted births - for low-risk pregnancies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Labor, Obstetric , COVID-19/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Parturition , Pregnancy
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(7): e1878-e1880, 2021 10 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1455258

ABSTRACT

Many patients are fearful of acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hospitals and clinics. We characterized the risk of COVID-19 among 226 patients exposed to healthcare workers with confirmed COVID-19. One patient may have been infected, suggesting that the risk of COVID-19 transmission from healthcare workers to patients is generally low.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Personnel , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Can Liver J ; 4(2): 79-81, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1256336
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL